THE GROWTH OF TECHNOLOGICAL INEQUALITIES IN THE FARM SECTOR OF THE BRAZILIAN STATE OF MINAS GERAIS
Leandro Frederico FerrazMeyer, Marcelo Josi Braga
Abstract
In this article we intend to analyze the pattern of technological diffusion associated with the process of farm sector modernization in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais. Therefore, we observed the state's 46 homogeneous micro-regions (MRHs) and applied factorial analysis and cluster analysis techniques to discover the factors that explain this sector's modernization and to group MRHs with similar technological characteristics. Using successive analysis of the groupings formed during every year of the study (1970, 1975, 1980 and 1985), it was possible to describe the dynamic of modern technology's regional diffusion into Minas Gerais' farm sector. The results showed that a great part of state's productive agricultural base was at the margin of the technological modernization process. To test the hypothesis that this result implied an increase in regional inequality; we analyzed the convergence of factors which indicate modernization. From this analysis, we verified the growth of regional technological inequalities in Minas Gerais' farm sector during the 15 year period, 1970 to 1985.
Keywords
Referências
Ahmad, S. A rejoinder to professor Kennedy. Economic Journal, London, v. 77, p. 960-963, 1967.
Ahrriad, S. O n the theory o f induces innovation. Economic Journal, London, v. 76, p. 344-357, 1966.
Binswanger, H.P. A microeconomic approach to induced innovation. Economic Journal, London, v. 84, n. 336, p. 940-958, 1974.
Bussab, W O., Miazaki, E. S., Andrade, D. F. Introdução à análise de agrupamentos. São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Estatística, 1990. 105 p. [mimeograf.).
De Janvry, A. Inducement of technological and institutional innovations: an interpretative framework. ln: ARNDT,T.M., DALRYMPLE, P.G., RUITAN, V.W (Ed.). Resource allocation and productivity in nacional and internacional agricultura! research. Minnesota: University of Minnesota, 1977. p. 551-563.
Duran, B. S., Odell, P. L. Cluster analysis - a survey. New York: Springer - Verlag, 1974. 137 p.
Everitt, B. Cluster analysis. London: Heinemann Educacional Books Ltd., 1977. 122p.
Fellner,W Commentontheinducedbias. EconomicJournal,London, v. 77, p. 662-664, 1967.
Fellner, W Does the market direct the relative factor-saving effects os technological progress? ln: Nelson, R.R. (Ed.). The rate and direction of investive activity. Princeton: Princeton University, 1962. p. 171-193.
Fellner, W Two propositions in the theory of induced innovations. Economic Journal, London, v. 71, p. 305-308, 1961.
FUNDAÇÃO JOÃO PINHEIRO - FJP. Produto interno bruto de Minas Gerais: municípios e regiões. Belo Horizonte, 1996. 95 p.
Griliches, Z. Hybrid com: an exploration in the economics oftechnical change. Econometrica, Oxford, v. 25, p. 501-522, 1957.
Hayami, Y., Ruttan, V.W Desenvolvimento agrícola: teoria e experiências internacionais. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 1988. 583 p.
Hoffmann, R. A dinâmica da modernização da agricultura em 157 microrregiões homogêneas do Brasil. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, Brasília, v. 30, n. 4, p. 271-290, 1992.
Katzman, M.T. Regional development policy in Brazil: the role of growth poles and development highways in Goiás. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Chicago, v. 24, p. 75-107, 1975.
Kennedy, C. Induced bias in innovation and the theory ofdistribution. Economic Journal, London, v. 74, p. 958-960, 1964.
Kennedy, C. On the theory of induced invention - a reply. Economic Journal, London, v. 77, p. 960-963, 1967.
Kennedy, C. Samuelson on the induced innovation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Harvard, v. 48, p. 442-444, 1966.
Kim, J.O., Mueller, C.W Introduction to factor analysis: what it is and how to do it. Beverly Hills: SAGE, 1978. 79 p. (Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 7-13).
Kleinbaum, D.G., Kuper, L.V. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. North Scituate, Massachussetts, 1978, p. 376-446.
Lamounier, B., Almeida, M.H.T. Determinantes políticos da política agrícola: um estudo de atores, demandas e mecanismos de decisão. Brasília: IPEA, 1994. 25 p. (Estudos de Política Agrícola, 9).
Manly, B.EJ. Multivariate statistical methods - a primer. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1986. 159 p.
Meyer, Leandro E E Modernização da agricultura e desenvolvimento sustentado: o caso de Minas Gerais. Viçosa: UFV, 1997.
Muller,G. Complexoagroindustrialemodernizaçãoagrária. SãoPaulo: Hucitec/EDUC, 1989. 149 p.
Nicholls, W.H. The transformation of agriculture in a semi- industrialized country: the case of Brazil. ln: THORBECKE E. (ed.) Theroleofagricultureineconomicdevelopment. NewYork: Columbia University Press, 1969. p. 311-378.
Samuelson, P.A. A theory of induced innovation along Kennedy- Weisacker lines. The Review ofEconomics and Statistics, Harvard, v. 47, p. 343-356, 1966a.
Samuelson, P.A. Rejoinder: agreements, disagreements, doubts and the case of induced Harrod-neutral technical change. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Harvard, v. 48, p. 444-448, 19666.
Schilderinck, J.H.F. Regression and factor analysis applied in econometries. Gilburg studies in econometrics, 2 ed. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division, 1978, p. 59-113.
Schmookler, J. Changes in industry and in the state of knowledge as the determinants ofindustrial invention. ln: NELSON, R.R. (Ed.). The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton: Princeton University, 1962. p. 195-232.
Schmookler, J. Invention and economis growth. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1966. 226p.
Schultz. T.W The economic organization of agriculture. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1953. 374p.
Schultz,T.W Atransformaçãodaagriculturatradicional. RiodeJaneiro: Zahar, 1965. 207p.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email