Política agrícola numa economia internacional bem integrada: O caso do Brasil
G. Edward Schuh
References
A YER, H.W. & SCHUH, G.E. Social rates of retum and other aspects of agricultura! research: the case of cotton in São Paulo, Brazil. Am. J. Agric, Econ., 54:557- 69, Nov. 1972.
BINSWANGER, H. Fiscal and legal incentives with environmental effects on the Brazilian Amazon. Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 1987. (Discussion Paper, 69).
GRILICHES, Z. Research expenàitures, education, and agregate agricultura! production function. Am. Ecoo. Rev., 54:961-74, Dec. 1964.
GRILICHES, Z.. The sources of masured productivity growth: United States Agriculture, 1940-1960. J. Polit. Ecoo., 71:331-46, Aug. 1963.
GISSER, M. Schooling and the farm problem. Ecooometrica, 33:562-92, July 1965. HA Y AMI, Y. & RUTTAN, V.W. Agricultural developmeot: an international perspective. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985. p.63-66.
JOHNSON, G. Forward prices for agriculture. s.l., University Chicago Press, 1946.
LOPES, M. & SCHUH, E. A mobilização dos recursos dii agricultura: uma análise política para o Brasil. s.l., CFP, 1979. (Coleção de Análises e Pesquisas, v.15).
SCHUH, G.E. The United and the development world: an economic perspective. Washington, D.C., National Planning Association, s.d.
SCHULTZ, T.W. Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven, Connecticut, Yale l,Jniversity Press, 1964.
SCHULTZ, T.W. The Value of the ability to deal with desequilibria. J. Econ. Literat., 13:827-46, Sep. 1975.
WELCH, F. Education in production. J. Polit. Econ., 78:35-59, Jan./Feb. 1970.