Uma proposição metodológica para a precificação de seguro de receita agrícola no Brasil
A methodological proposition on ratemaking for crop revenue insurance in Brazil
Cláudio Silveira Brisolara; Vitor Augusto Ozaki
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Abstract: This work aimed to study the alternative ways of calculating the revenue insurance premium rate, taking as an example the case of soybeans in Campo Mourão and Toledo. Revenue insurance guarantees protection against price and yield risks. The premium rate is one of the central elements in the development of insurance products. Two approaches were presented: the univariate and the bivariate. The results showed significant differences when comparing the methodologies. Revenue insurance was at a higher level than the yield insurance, possibly inflated by the effect of price risk.
Keywords
Referências
Adami, A., & Ozaki, V. (2016). Estudo sobre a viabilidade do seguro receita: o caso da região oeste do Paraná.
Arias, D., Mendes, P., & Abel, P. (2015).
Badcock, B., & Hennessy, D. (1996). Input demand under yield and revenue insurance.
Bielza, M., Garrido, A., & Sumpsi, J. (2004). Revenue insurance as an income stabilization policy: an application to the Spanish olive oil sector. Cahiers d’ Économie et Sociologie Rurales, 70, 5-27.
Botts, R., & Boles, J. (1958). Use of normal-curve theory in crop insurance ratemaking.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento - MAPA. (2020).
Centro de Estudos Avançado em Economia Aplicada – CEPEA. (2018).
Coble, K., Heifner, R., & Zuniga, M. (2000). Implications of crop yield and revenue insurance for producer hedging.
Coble, K., Knight, T., Goodwin, B., Miller, M., & Rejesus, R. (2010).
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento – CONAB. (2017).
Fundação Getúlio Vargas – FGV. (2018).
Goodwin, B., & Ker, A. (1998). Nonparametric estimation of crop yield distributions: implications for rating group-risk crop insurance contracts.
Goodwin, B., & Ker, A. (2002). Modeling price and yield risk. In R. Just & R. Pope (Eds.),
Goodwin, B., & Mahul, O. (2004).
Goodwin, B., Roberts, M., & Coble, K. (2000). Measurement of price risk in revenue insurance: implications of distributional assumptions.
Harri, A., Erdem, C., Coble, K., & Knight, T. (2009). Crop Yield Distributions: a reconciliation of previous research and statistical tests for normality.
Hennessy, D., Badcock, B., & Hayes, D. (1997). The budgetary and producer welfare effects of revenue assurance.
Hull, J. (2005).
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. (2018).
Instituto Paranaense de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social – IPARDES.
Johnson, M., & Tenenbein, A. (1981). A bivariate distribution family with specified marginal.
Johnson, R., & Wichern, D. (2007).
Just, R., & Weninger, Q. (1999). Are crop yields normally distributed?
Ker, A., & Goodwin, B. (2000). Nonparametric estimation of crop insurance rates revisited.
Lapan, H., & Moschini, G. (1994). Hedging under price, basis, and production risk.
Lawas, C. (2005).
Micheleto, G. (2011).
Nelson, C., & Preckel, P. (1989). The conditional beta distribution as a stochastic production function.
Ozaki, V. (2005).
Ramirez, A., Manfredo, M., & Sanders, D. (2005). Revenue insurance for Spanish wine grapes.
Tew, B., & Reid, D. (1988). Probability distributions of crop prices, yields, and gross revenue.
Turvey, C. (1992). Contingent claim pricing models implied by agricultural stabilization and insurance policies.
Umberto, C. (2011). Copulas in finance. In M. Lovric (Ed.),
Upadhyay, B., & Smith, E. (2005). Modeling crop yield distributions from small samples. In
Vedenov, D. (2008). Application of copulas to estimation of joint crop yield distributions. In
Wolf, C., Black, R., & Hadrich, J. (2009). Upper Midwest dairy farm revenue variation and insurance implications.
Submetido em:
27/03/2020
Aceito em:
17/02/2021