Distribución de la propiedad rural en Colombia en el siglo XXI
Distribution of rural property in Colombia during the XXI Century
Fabio Alberto Pachón Ariza
Resumen
Palabras clave
Resumo
Abstract: Land concentration in Colombia is a historical problem still unsolved; a situation that is also common in other countries of the continent. Latin America and especially South America show a high Gini coefficient for land than other continents. Paraguay and Chile are the countries with the highest land concentration in South America; while Colombia, in addition to the high concentration, suffers from problems associated with an armed conflict closely linked to the agrarian problem. This concentration shows the failure of the land policy implemented during the 20th century, both that led by the State and that guided by the market. This article shows, based on official data, the evolution of land distribution during the first two decades of the XXI century, evidencing the persistence of a historical concentration and the limited results of the implementation of the Peace Agreement in terms of its distribution. It also proposes the aspects that should be taken into account to carry out an alternative agrarian reform to traditional views, a community-based land policy.
Palavras-chave
Referências
Aliber, M., & Cousins, B. (2013). Livelihoods after land reform in South Africa.
Antunes, T. G. (2018). O Imposto Territorial Rural (ITR) como ferramenta da gestão tributária.
Bautista, R., Bazoberry, O., Gil, K., Chumacero, J., & Soliz, L. (2017).
Berry, R. A. (2017). Reflections on injustice, inequality and land conflict in Colombia.
Borras, S. M. (2003). Questioning market-led agrarian reform: experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa.
Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2011). Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction.
Botia-Carreño, W. H. (2019). Unidad Agrícola Familiar (UAF), instrumento de política pública agropecuaria en Colombia.
Brittain, J. J. (2005). A theory of accelerating rural violence: lauchlin currie’s role in underdeveloping Colombia.
Cárdenas, J. C. (2009).
Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. (2013).
Colombia. Agencia Presidencial para la Acción Social y la Cooperación Internacional, Proyecto Protección de Tierras y Patrimonio de la Población. (2010).
Comisión Económica para América Latina – CPAL. (2004).
Deinlnger, K., & Binswanger, H. (1999). The evolution of the World Bank’s land policy: principles, experience, and future challenges.
Duarte, C., Duque, A. M., Cardoza, G., Castaño, A., Correa, J., Marmolejo, M., Montaño, M., Ochoa, M., Ramirez, C., & Trujillo, D. (2019).
Echeñique, J. (2011).
Eguren, F. (2018). La agricultura en los paises andinos: Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru y Venezuela: una revision de largo plazo 1961-2014.
Fajardo, D. (2002).
Favat, P. A., & Gutiérrez, G. (2010). Crecimiento de la agricultura en Uruguay: exclusión social o integración económica en redes.
Forero Rueda, S. (2020, Abril 13). Así va el Acuerdo de Paz: La deuda con la Reforma Rural Integral.
Goebel, A. (2012). Gender and agrarian reforms.
Gómez, C. J. L., Sánchez-Ayala, L., & Vargas, G. A. (2015). Armed conflict, land grabs and primitive accumulation in Colombia: micro processes, macro trends and the puzzles in between.
Grajales, J. (2015). Land grabbing, legal contention and institutional change in Colombia.
Gras, C., & Göbel, B. (2014). Agronegocio y desigualdades socioambientales: La soja en Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay. In B. Göbel, M. Góngora-Mera & A. Ulloa (Orgs.),
Guereña, A., & Burgos, S. O. (2016).
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons.
Hirschman, A. O. (2013). la tenencia de la tierra y la reforma agraria en Colombia. Empleo de las armas fiscales.
Hoffmann, R. (1979). Estimação da desigualdade dentro de estratos no cálculo do índice de Gini e da redundância.
Hristov, J. (2005). Indigenous struggles for land and culture in Cauca, Colombia.
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. (2004).
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. (2010).
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. (2012).
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. (2013).
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. (2014).
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. (2018).
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. (2019).
Karl, R. A. (2017). Century of the exile: Colombia’s displacement and land restitution in historical perspective, 1940s–1960s.
Kay, C. (1998). Latin America’s agrarian reform: lights and shadows.
Kay, C. (2002). Chile’s neoliberal agrarian transformation and the peasantry.
LeGrand, C. C., van Isschot, L., & Riaño-Alcalá, P. (2017). Land, justice, and memory: Challenges for peace in Colombia.
Machado, A. (2009).
Machado, A. (2013).
Machado, A., & Vivas, J. (2009).
Neto, A. M. (1992). Imposto territorial rural (ITR): algumas considerações.
Nilsson, M., & Taylor, L. K. (2017). Applying the security-development nexus on the ground: land restitution in Colombia.
Ostrom, E. (2009).
Palau, M. (2019).
Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2002). The peasantry and the state in Latin America: a troubled past, an uncertain future.
Quijano-Mejia, C. M., & Linares-García, J. (2017). Zonas de reserva campesina: territorialidades en disputa. El caso del Valle del río Cimitarra.
Quintero, J. C. (1988).
Reboratti, C. (2010). Un mar de soja: la nueva agricultura en Argentina y sus consecuencias.
Sikor, T., & Müller, D. (2009). The limits of state-led land reform: an introduction.
Souza, S. S., & Silva, E. A. (2011). Regional planning in the land reform literature: a gap to be bridged.
Thomson, F. (2011). The agrarian question and violence in Colombia: conflict and development.
Uruguay. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. (2015).
Von Benda-Beckmann, F., Von Benda-Beckmann, K., & Wiber, M. (2006). The properties of property.
Submetido em:
18/08/2020
Aceito em:
20/03/2021
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email