Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
https://revistasober.org/article/doi/10.1590/1806-9479.2021.249339
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
Original Article

Local public-private partnerships to promote innovation in agricultural value chains: the case of cocoa in Colombia

Alianzas público-privadas locales para promover la innovación en cadenas de valor agrícolas: el caso del cacao en Colombia

Carlos Julián Ramírez-Gómez; Holmes Rodríguez-Espinosa

Downloads: 0
Views: 21

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of developing more viable local public-private partnerships (LPPP) which may result in innovation in the cocoa value chain, through the agricultural innovation system functions approach. Research was conducted in two rural municipalities in the Department of Antioquia, Colombia. A focus group with stakeholders as well as directed surveys were implemented. 15 experts in the municipality of Necoclí, and 18 experts in the municipality of Caucasia participated. The data were analyzed quantitatively and the MACTOR method was used in order to determine the relationship between actors and the strategic objectives for innovation. Case studies revealed different dynamics, both from the perspective of the interests at play when actors prioritized key variables in each region, as well as their vision regarding strategic objectives to promote innovation in the cocoa value chain. Different degrees of convergence and correspondence between actors and strategic objectives in each region provided the grounds to determine the possible partnerships in the cocoa chain. Key actors with different capabilities and resources were also identified, as they could contribute to leveraging local innovation should a partnership come to be developed.

Keywords

innovation system, agricultural chain, partnerships, rural regions

Resumo

Resumen: El propósito de este estudio es explorar Alianzas Público-Privadas Locales (APPL) más factibles, que permitan promover la innovación en la cadena de valor de cacao, a partir del enfoque de funciones del sistema de innovación agrícola. La investigación fue realizada en dos municipios rurales localizados en el Departamento de Antioquia, Colombia, haciendo en cada uno un grupo focal con diversos actores seleccionados, donde participaron 15 expertos en el Municipio de Necoclí y 18 expertos en el municipio de Caucasia. Los datos fueron analizados cuantitativamente y mediante el software MACTOR para determinar la relación entre actores y objetivos estratégicos para la innovación. Los estudios de caso revelaron diferentes dinámicas, tanto desde los intereses de los actores en la priorización de variables clave en cada territorio, como en su visión con respecto a los objetivos estratégicos para fomentar la innovación local en la cadena de cacao. Los diferentes grados de convergencias y correspondencias, entre actores y objetivos estratégicos en cada territorio, permitieron determinar las posibles alianzas (APPL) en la cadena de cacao. Para ello también se identificaron actores clave, los cuales cuentan con diferentes capacidades y recursos que, en el marco de una alianza, podrían contribuir a aprovechar la innovación local.
 

Palavras-chave

sistema de innovación, cadena agrícola, alianzas, territorio = áreas rurales

Referências

Anandajayasekeram, P., & Berhanu, G. (2009). Integrating innovation systems perspective and value chain analysis in agricultural research for development: implications and challenges. Retrieved in 2021, March 2, from www.ipms-ethiopia.org

Antioquia. (2019). Plan de ordenamiento territorial agropecuario de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia.

Audouin, S., Gazull, L., & Gautier, D. (2018). Territory matters: exploring the functioning of an innovation system through the filter of local territorial practices - the example of the adoption of cashew trees in Burkina Faso. Journal of Rural Studies, 63, 130-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.08.007

Ayele, S., Duncan, A., Larbi, A., & Khanh, T. T. (2012). Enhancing innovation in livestock value chains through networks: lessons from fodder innovation case studies in developing countries. Science & Public Policy, 39(3), 333-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs022

Busse, M., Schwerdtner, W., Siebert, R., Doernberg, A., Kuntosch, A., König, B., & Bokelmann, W. (2015). Analysis of animal monitoring technologies in Germany from an innovation system perspective. Agricultural Systems, 138, 55-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.05.009

Cámara de Comercio de Medellín – CCM. (2011). Cadena del cacao en Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia.

Chaves, R. (2010). Inovatividade no Sistema Brasileiro de Inovação na Agricultura: uma análise baseada na política de cooperação internacional da Embrapa (Tese de doutorado). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Chechi, L. A., & Schultz, G. (2019). Inovação, conhecimento e aprendizagem: um estudo sobre Arranjos Produtivos Locais de erva-mate no sul do Brasil. Mundo Agrario, 20(43), e108. http://dx.doi.org/10.24215/15155994e108

Coates, J. F. (2000). Scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(1), 115-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00084-0

Delgado-Serrano, M. M., Vanwildemeersch, P., London, S., Ortiz-Guerrero, C. E., Escalante Semerena, R., & Rojas, M. (2016). Adapting prospective structural analysis to strengthen sustainable management and capacity building in community-based natural resource management contexts. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08505-210236

Devaux, A., Torero, M., Donovan, J., & Horton, D. (2018). Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 8(1), 99-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2017-0065

Eastwood, C., Klerkx, L., & Nettle, R. (2017). Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies.Journal of Rural Studies,49, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008

Escobar, S., Santander, M., Useche, P., Contreras, C., & Rodríguez, J. (2020). Aligning strategic objectives with research and development activities in a soft commodity sector: a technological plan for colombian cocoa producers. Agriculture, 10(5), 141. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10050141

Federacion Nacional de Cacaoteros. (2019). Producción nacional de cacao. Retrieved in 2021, March 2, from http://www.fedecacao.com.co/portal/index.php/es/2015-02-12-17-20-59/nacionales

García-Cáceres, R. G., Perdomo, A., Perdomo, A., Ortiz, O., Ortiz, O., Beltrán, P., Beltrán, P., López, K., & López, K. (2014). Characterization of the supply and value chains of Colombian cocoa. Dyna (Bilbao), 81(187), 30-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n187.39555

Godet, M. (2000). The art of scenarios and strategic planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(1), 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00120-1

Godet, M., Monti, R., Meunier, F., & Roubelat, F. (2004). Scenarios and strategies: a toolbox for scenario planning (Working Papers, No. spe.). Laboratory for Investigation in Prospective and Strategy (LIPS).

Gutiérrez García, G. A., Gutiérrez-Montes, I., Hernández Núñez, H. E., Suárez Salazar, J. C., & Casanoves, F. (2020). Relevance of local knowledge in decision-making and rural innovation: a methodological proposal for leveraging participation of Colombian cocoa producers. Journal of Rural Studies, 75, 119-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.012

Hall, A. (2006). Public Private Sector Partnerships in an Agricultural System of Innovation: Concepts and Challenges. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 5(1), 3-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.5.1.3/1

Hartwich, F., Gonzalez, C., & Vieira, L. (2005). Public-private partnerships for innovation-led growth in agrichains: a useful tool for development in Latin America (ISNAR Discussion Paper, No. 1). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413-432.

Hekkert, M., & Negro, S. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584-594.

Hermans, F., Geerling-Eiff, F., Potters, J., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments: assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 88(1), 76-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2018.10.001

Hermans, F., Klerkx, L., & Roep, D. (2015). Structural conditions for collaboration and learning in innovation networks: using an innovation system performance lens to analyse agricultural knowledge systems.The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension,21(1), 35-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.991113

Hermans, F., Stuiver, M., Beers, P. J., & Kok, K. (2013). The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems, 115, 117-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.006

Kebebe, E., Duncan, A. J., Klerkx, L., de Boer, I. J. M., & Oosting, S. J. (2015). Understanding socio-economic and policy constraints to dairy development in Ethiopia: A coupled functional-structural innovation systems analysis. Agricultural Systems, 141, 69-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.09.007

Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103(6), 390-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012

Kozicka, M., Tacconi, F., Horna, D., & Gotor, E. (2018). Forecasting cocoa yields for 2050. Rome: Bioversity International.

Lamprinopoulou, C., Renwick, A., Klerkx, L., Hermans, F., & Roep, D. (2014). Application of an integrated systemic framework for analysing agricultural innovation systems and informing innovation policies: Comparing the Dutch and Scottish agrifood sectors. Agricultural Systems, 129, 40-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.001

Minh, T. T. (2019). Unpacking the systemic problems and blocking mechanisms of a regional agricultural innovation system: An integrated regional-functional-structural analysis. Agricultural Systems, 173, 268-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.009

Narrod, C., Roy, D., Okello, J., Avendaño, B., Rich, K., & Thorat, A. (2009). Public – private partnerships and collective action in high value fruit and vegetable supply chains. Food Policy, 34(1), 8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.005

Pamuk, H., Bulte, E., & Adekunle, A. (2014). Do decentralized innovation systems promote agricultural technology adoption? Experimental evidence from Africa. Food Policy, 44, 227-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.09.015

Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2007). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for adaptation to land degradation: Kalahari rangeland management options. Land Degradation & Development, 18(3), 249-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.777

Rodríguez, H., Ramírez-Gómez, C. J., & Restrepo-Betancur, L. F. (2015). Propuesta metodológica para la formulación participativa de programas de desarrollo agropecuario local. Luna Azul, (40), 224–239.

Sánchez Vargas, A. D. P., Castellanos Domínguez, Ó. F., & Domínguez Martínez, K. P. (2008). Mejoramiento de la poscosecha del cacao a partir del roadmapping. Ingenieria e Investigacion, 28, 150-158.

Santander Muñoz, M., Rodríguez Cortina, J., Vaillant, F. E., & Escobar Parra, S. (2020). An overview of the physical and biochemical transformation of cocoa seeds to beans and to chocolate: flavor formation. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60(10), 1593-1613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1581726

Schut, M., Klerkx, L., Rodenburg, J., Kayeke, J., Hinnou, L. C., Raboanarielina, C. M., Adegbola, P. Y., van Ast, A., & Bastiaans, L. (2014). RAAIS : Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity. Agricultural Systems, 132, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.009

Spers, R. A. G., Wright, J. T. C., & Amedomar, A. de A. (2013). Scenarios for the milk production chain in Brazil in 2020. Revista ADM, 48(2), 254-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.5700/rausp1086

Teixeira, P. J. P. L., Thomazella, D. P. T., & Pereira, G. A. G. (2015). Time for chocolate: current understanding and New perspectives on cacao Witches’ broom disease research. PLoS Pathogens, 11(10), e1005130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005130

Thitinunsomboon, S., Chairatana, P. A., & Keeratipibul, S. (2008). Sectoral innovation systems in agriculture: the case of rice in thailand. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 16(1), 83-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2008.9668648

Turner, J. A., Klerkx, L., White, T., Payne, T., Everett-Hincks, J., Mackay, A., & Botha, N. (2015). Unpacking systemic capacity to innovate: how projects coordinate capabilities across agricultural innovation system levels. In INRA ImpAR Conference. Paris.

Turner, J. A., Williams, T., Nicholas, G., Foote, J., Rijswijk, K., Barnard, T., Beechener, S., & Horita, A. (2017). Triggering system innovation in agricultural innovation systems : initial insights from a community for change in New Zealand. Outlook on Agriculture, 46(2), 125-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0030727017708500

Turner, J., Klerkx, L., Rijswijk, K., Williams, T., & Barnard, T. (2016). Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 76(1), 99-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2015.12.001

van der Meer, K. (2002). Public-private cooperation in agricultural research: examples from the Netherlands. In D. Byerlee & R. G. Echeverria (Eds.), Agricultural research policy in an era of privatization: experiences from the developing world. Wallingford: CABI. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851996004.0123.

Wellbrock, W., & Roep, D. (2015). The Learning rural area framework: a heuristic tool to investigate institutional arrangements which support collaboration in rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis, 55(1), 106-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soru.12049

Wieczorek, A. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science & Public Policy, 39(1), 74-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scr008

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
 


Submetido em:
02/03/2021

Aceito em:
21/05/2021

613b5601a953956f3106cd63 resr Articles
Links & Downloads

resr

Share this page
Page Sections