Análise sob a ótica da teoria engajamento dos stakeholders dos fatores que a literatura aponta como limitando o desenvolvimento de IGs
Factors that the specialized literature identifies as limiting the development of GIs: an analysis through the lens of the stakeholder engagement theory
Jane Mary Albinati Malaguti; Ilan Avrichir
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
The number of Geographic Indications (GI) recognized by both private and governmental entities on emerging countries has increased substantially. This number is followed by evidence of the fact that a significant proportion of such IGs does not fulfill the expected goals on regards of them contributing to regional and local development.In order to GIs become active in the market, it is necessary that the needs and expectations from multiple stakeholders to be met. This article performed a systematic literature review (SLR) with the goal to identify what are the factors that present time academic research points to as the reasons for non-successful development of GIs and analyze them through the lens of the Stakeholder’s Engagement Theory. The analysis contains 29 published articles between the years of 2017 and 2022 that point out detrimental factors for GIs development. SLR identified 13 factors, which were grouped in three causal categories. This investigation contributes to the literature of GIs development as it identifies and summarizes those factors, thus providing a conceptual basis to diagnose the reasons why stakeholders are not engaging on specific GIs.
Keywords
References
Adebola, T. (2023). The legal construction of geographical indications in Africa.
Ayala Durán, C., & Radomsky, G. (2020). Indicaciones geográficas en Centroamérica: un crecimiento poco diversificado.
Barbosa, J. N. (2012).
Bardin, L. (2011).
Bashir, A. (2020). Protection of geographical indication products from different states of India.
Bosse, D. A., & Coughlan, R. (2016). Stakeholder relationship bonds.
Bowen, S. (2010). Embedding local places in global spaces: geographical indications as a territorial development strategy.
Brasil. (1996). Lei nº 9.279, de 14 de maio de 1996. Regula direitos e obrigações relativos à propriedade industrial.
Bridoux, F. M., & Vishwanathan, P. (2020). When do powerful stakeholders give managers the latitude to balance all stakeholders’ interests?
Bundy, J., Vogel, R. M., & Zachary, M. A. (2018). Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders.
Bustamante, J. C. (2019). Intellectual property rights as branding services for exports value-adding: an analysis of Chile-s-Sello de Origen-programme.
Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility.
Carbone, A. (2017). Food supply chains: coordination governance and other shaping forces.
Castelló, E. (2021). The will for terroir: a communicative approach.
Cerdan, C., Andrade, N., Silva, A. L., Vieira, H., Silva, E., & Le Guerroue, J. L. (2018). Agricultural research, a key factor in promoting collective dynamics in rural area: the” Vales da Uva Goethe” Geographical Indication (IG) in Brazil.
Chabrol, D., Mariani, M., & Sautier, D. (2017). Establishing geographical indications without state involvement? Learning from case studies in Central and West Africa.
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance.
Cundy, A. B., Bardos, R. P., Church, A., Puschenreiter, M., Friesl-Hanl, W., Müller, I., Neu, S., Mench, M., Witters, N., & Vangronsveld, J. (2013). Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for “gentle” remediation approaches: the European context.
Dawkins, C. E. (2014). The principle of good faith: Toward substantive stakeholder engagement.
Derry, R. (2012). Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders.
Desai, V. M. (2018). Collaborative stakeholder engagement: An integration between theories of organizational legitimacy and learning.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications.
Drivas, K., & Iliopoulos, C. (2017). An empirical investigation in the relationship between PDOs/PGIs and trademarks.
Dullius, P. R. (2009).
Europe Direct. (2023).
Freeman, R. E. (1984).
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & Colle, S. (2010).
Fronzaglia, T. (2023). A evolução da indicação geográfica da França ao Brasil: emergência, difusão, adaptação e perspectivas. In
García-Hernández, C., Ruiz-Fernández, J., & Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, F. (2022). Geographical indications in cheese mountain areas: opportunity or threat to landscape and environmental conservation? The case of Cabrales (Spain).
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility.
Hine, J. A., & Preuss, L. (2009). “Society is out there, organisation is in here”: on the perceptions of corporate social responsibility held by different managerial groups.
Hossain, M. (2018). Frugal innovation: a review and research agenda.
Ingram, V., Hansen, M. E., & Bosselmann, A. S. (2020). To label or not? Governing the costs and benefits of geographic indication of an African forest honey value chain.
Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial – INPI. (2021).
Kohsaka, R., & Miyake, Y. (2021). The politics of quality and geographic indications for non-timber forest products: applying convention theory beyond food contexts.
Kokthi, E., Guri, G., & Muco, E. (2021). Assessing the applicability of geographical indications from the social capital analysis perspective: evidences from Albania.
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement: past, present, and future.
Mafra, L. A. S. (2008).
Mancini, M. C., Guareschi, M., Bellassen, V., & Arfini, F. (2022). Geographical indications and public good relationships: evidence and policy implications.
Manisha, Rao, R. V. S., Reddy, B. S., & Verma, P. (2022). What is brewing with Kangra tea!!
Mariani, M., Cerdan, C., & Peri, I. (2021). Origin food schemes and the paradox of reducing diversity to defend it.
Marie‐Vivien, D. (2020). Protection of geographical indications in ASEAN countries: convergences and challenges to awakening sleeping geographical Indications.
Marsoof, A., & Tan, L. T. (2021). A CSR/fair trade inspired policy for fairer geographical indications.
Millet, M., & Casabianca, F. (2019). Sharing values for changing practices, a lever for sustainable transformation? The case of farmers and processors in interaction within localized cheese sectors.
Millet, M., Keast, V., Gonano, S., & Casabianca, F. (2020). Product qualification as a means of identifying sustainability pathways for place-based agri-food systems: the case of the GI Corsican grapefruit (France).
Mishra, A., & Fatesaria, H. (2022). Basmati rice: the on-going domestic challenge.
Mitchell, J. R., Mitchell, R. K., Hunt, R. A., Townsend, D. M., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Stakeholder engagement, knowledge problems and ethical challenges.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.
Neilson, J., Wright, J., & Aklimawati, L. (2018). Geographical indications and value capture in the Indonesia coffee sector.
Niederle, P. A., Mascarenhas, G. C. C., & Wilkinson, J. (2017). Governança e institucionalização das indicações geográficas no Brasil.
Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management.
O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2014). Managing CSR stakeholder engagement: a new conceptual framework.
Owen, L., Udall, D., Franklin, A., & Kneafsey, M. (2020). Place-based pathways to sustainability: Exploring alignment between geographical indications and the concept of agroecology territories in Wales.
Pérez-Akaki, P., Vega-Vera, N. V., Enríquez-Caballero, Y. P., & Velázquez-Salazar, M. (2021). Designation of origin distillates in Mexico: value chains and territorial development.
Pick, B., & Marie-Vivien, D. (2021). Representativeness in geographical indications: a comparison between the state-driven and producer-driven systems in Vietnam and France.
Pisoni, A., Michelini, L., & Martignoni, G. (2018). Frugal approach to innovation: State of the art and future perspectives.
Priyadarshini, T., & Iyer, K. (2020). Sustenance of languishing craft-Gollabhama Saree of Siddipet, Telegana, India.
Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F., Penker, M., Belletti, G., Marescotti, A., Scaramuzzi, S., Barzini, E., Pircher, M., Leitgeb, F., & Samper-Gartner, L. F. (2016). Insights into the black box of collective efforts for the registration of Geographical Indications.
Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas – Sebrae. (2021).
Sekine, K. (2021). The potential and contradictions of geographical indication and patrimonization for the sustainability of indigenous communities: a case of cordillera heirloom rice in the Philippines.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review.
Uchiyama, Y., Tanaka, Y., Matsuoka, H., & Kohsaka, R. (2017). Expectations of residents and tourists of agriculture-related certification systems: analysis of public perceptions.
van der Merwe, M., Kirsten, J. F., & Trienekens, J. H. (2018). The Karoo Meat of Origin certification scheme: a silver bullet?
Vandecandelaere, E. (2010). Geographic origin and identification labels: associating food quality with location. In J. Albert (Ed.),
Vandecandelaere, E., Teyssier, C., Barjolle, D., Fournier, S., Beucherie, O., & Jeanneaux, P. (2020). Strengthening sustainable food systems through geographical indications: evidence from 9 worldwide case studies.
Warui, M. W., Mburu, J., Kironchi, G., & Gikungu, M. (2020). Existing value addition initiatives enhancing recognition of territorial traits of three Kenyan honey.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review.
Submitted date:
08/28/2023
Accepted date:
03/12/2024
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email