Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
https://revistasober.org/article/doi/10.1590/1806-9479.2023.277978pt
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
ARTIGO ORIGINAL

Análise sob a ótica da teoria engajamento dos stakeholders dos fatores que a literatura aponta como limitando o desenvolvimento de IGs

Factors that the specialized literature identifies as limiting the development of GIs: an analysis through the lens of the stakeholder engagement theory

Jane Mary Albinati Malaguti; Ilan Avrichir

Downloads: 0
Views: 272

Resumo

O número de Indicações Geográficas (IG) reconhecidas por entidades governamentais ou privadas em países com economias emergentes tem aumentado muito. Este aumento é acompanhado por evidências de que proporção significativa de IGs não atinge os objetivos de contribuir para o desenvolvimento regional e local. Para que as IGs se tornem ativas no mercado, é necessário que as necessidades e expectativas dos grupos de partes interessadas, stakeholders, tenham suas necessidades e expectativas atendidas. Este artigo realiza revisão sistemática da literatura (RSL) para identificar os fatores que a pesquisa acadêmica aponta como causas do não desenvolvimento das IGs e os analisa sob a perspectiva da Teoria do Engajamento de Stakeholders. Realizamos análise de conteúdo de 29 artigos publicados entre 2017 e 2022 sobre fatores que limitam o desenvolvimento das IGs. A RSL identifica 13 fatores agrupados em três categorias como causas. A investigação contribui para a literatura sobre o desenvolvimento das IGs identificando fatores que limitam o seu desenvolvimento e analisando esses fatores na perspectiva do envolvimento dos stakeholders. Fornece uma base conceptual para diagnosticar as razões para o não envolvimento dos stakeholders nas IGs.

Palavras-chave

indicações geográficas, engajamento, stakeholders, produtor rural

Abstract

The number of Geographic Indications (GI) recognized by both private and governmental entities on emerging countries has increased substantially. This number is followed by evidence of the fact that a significant proportion of such IGs does not fulfill the expected goals on regards of them contributing to regional and local development.In order to GIs become active in the market, it is necessary that the needs and expectations from multiple stakeholders to be met. This article performed a systematic literature review (SLR) with the goal to identify what are the factors that present time academic research points to as the reasons for non-successful development of GIs and analyze them through the lens of the Stakeholder’s Engagement Theory. The analysis contains 29 published articles between the years of 2017 and 2022 that point out detrimental factors for GIs development. SLR identified 13 factors, which were grouped in three causal categories. This investigation contributes to the literature of GIs development as it identifies and summarizes those factors, thus providing a conceptual basis to diagnose the reasons why stakeholders are not engaging on specific GIs.

Keywords

geographical indications, engagement, stakeholders, rural producer

Referências

Adebola, T. (2023). The legal construction of geographical indications in Africa. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 26(1), 3-29.

Ayala Durán, C., & Radomsky, G. (2020). Indicaciones geográficas en Centroamérica: un crecimiento poco diversificado. Rivar, 7(20), 1-21.

Barbosa, J. N. (2012). Isótopos estáveis para a discriminação da origem geográfica de cafés especiais da Serra da Mantiqueira de Minas Gerais (Tese de doutorado). Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras.

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.

Bashir, A. (2020). Protection of geographical indication products from different states of India. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25(3-4), 74-79.

Bosse, D. A., & Coughlan, R. (2016). Stakeholder relationship bonds. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1197-1222.

Bowen, S. (2010). Embedding local places in global spaces: geographical indications as a territorial development strategy. Rural Sociology, 75(2), 209-243.

Brasil. (1996). Lei nº 9.279, de 14 de maio de 1996. Regula direitos e obrigações relativos à propriedade industrial. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília.

Bridoux, F. M., & Vishwanathan, P. (2020). When do powerful stakeholders give managers the latitude to balance all stakeholders’ interests? Business & Society, 59(2), 232-262.

Bundy, J., Vogel, R. M., & Zachary, M. A. (2018). Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 476-501.

Bustamante, J. C. (2019). Intellectual property rights as branding services for exports value-adding: an analysis of Chile-s-Sello de Origen-programme. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 9(3-4), 315-341.

Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.

Carbone, A. (2017). Food supply chains: coordination governance and other shaping forces. Agricultural and Food Economics, 5(1), 3.

Castelló, E. (2021). The will for terroir: a communicative approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 386-397.

Cerdan, C., Andrade, N., Silva, A. L., Vieira, H., Silva, E., & Le Guerroue, J. L. (2018). Agricultural research, a key factor in promoting collective dynamics in rural area: the” Vales da Uva Goethe” Geographical Indication (IG) in Brazil. Cahiers Agricultures, 27(2), 1.

Chabrol, D., Mariani, M., & Sautier, D. (2017). Establishing geographical indications without state involvement? Learning from case studies in Central and West Africa. World Development, 98, 68-81.

Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.

Cundy, A. B., Bardos, R. P., Church, A., Puschenreiter, M., Friesl-Hanl, W., Müller, I., Neu, S., Mench, M., Witters, N., & Vangronsveld, J. (2013). Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for “gentle” remediation approaches: the European context. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 283-291.

Dawkins, C. E. (2014). The principle of good faith: Toward substantive stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 283-295.

Derry, R. (2012). Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 253-264.

Desai, V. M. (2018). Collaborative stakeholder engagement: An integration between theories of organizational legitimacy and learning. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 220-244.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.

Drivas, K., & Iliopoulos, C. (2017). An empirical investigation in the relationship between PDOs/PGIs and trademarks. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8, 585-595.

Dullius, P. R. (2009). Indicações geográficas e desenvolvimento territorial: as experiências do Rio Grande do Sul (Dissertação de mestrado). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Santa Maria.

Europe Direct. (2023). Indicações geográficas: um património europeu no valor de 75 000 milhões de euros. Recuperado em 25 de novembro de 2023, de https://europedirectminho.ipca.pt/indicacoes-geograficas-um-patrimonio-europeu-no-valor-de-75-000-milhoes-de-euros/

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. London: Pitman Publising.

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fronzaglia, T. (2023). A evolução da indicação geográfica da França ao Brasil: emergência, difusão, adaptação e perspectivas. In Propriedade Intelectual, Desenvolvimento e Inovação: perspectivas futuras (pp. 138-159). Ponta Grossa: AYA Editora. http://dx.doi.org/10.47573/aya.5379.2.197.8.

García-Hernández, C., Ruiz-Fernández, J., & Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, F. (2022). Geographical indications in cheese mountain areas: opportunity or threat to landscape and environmental conservation? The case of Cabrales (Spain). Applied Geography, 146, 102753.

Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327.

Hine, J. A., & Preuss, L. (2009). “Society is out there, organisation is in here”: on the perceptions of corporate social responsibility held by different managerial groups. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 381-393.

Hossain, M. (2018). Frugal innovation: a review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 926-936.

Ingram, V., Hansen, M. E., & Bosselmann, A. S. (2020). To label or not? Governing the costs and benefits of geographic indication of an African forest honey value chain. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 3, 102.

Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial – INPI. (2021). Pedidos de indicação geográfica no Brasil. Recuperado em 14 de fevereiro de 2023, de https://www.gov.br/inpi/pt-br/servicos/indicacoes-geograficas/pedidos-de-indicacao-geografica-no-brasil

Kohsaka, R., & Miyake, Y. (2021). The politics of quality and geographic indications for non-timber forest products: applying convention theory beyond food contexts. Journal of Rural Studies, 88, 28-39.

Kokthi, E., Guri, G., & Muco, E. (2021). Assessing the applicability of geographical indications from the social capital analysis perspective: evidences from Albania. Economia e Sociologia, 14(3), 32-53.

Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement: past, present, and future. Business & Society, 61(5), 1136-1196.

Mafra, L. A. S. (2008). Indicação geográfica e construção do mercado: a valorização da origem no Cerrado Mineiro (Tese de doutorado). Curso de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento Agricultura e Sociedade, Instituto de Ciências Humanas e Sociais, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.

Mancini, M. C., Guareschi, M., Bellassen, V., & Arfini, F. (2022). Geographical indications and public good relationships: evidence and policy implications. EuroChoices, 21(2), 66-71.

Manisha, Rao, R. V. S., Reddy, B. S., & Verma, P. (2022). What is brewing with Kangra tea!! FIIB Business Review, 8(2), 94-101.

Mariani, M., Cerdan, C., & Peri, I. (2021). Origin food schemes and the paradox of reducing diversity to defend it. Sociologia Ruralis, 61(2), 465-490.

Marie‐Vivien, D. (2020). Protection of geographical indications in ASEAN countries: convergences and challenges to awakening sleeping geographical Indications. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23(3-4), 328-349.

Marsoof, A., & Tan, L. T. (2021). A CSR/fair trade inspired policy for fairer geographical indications. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 24(3-4), 253-273.

Millet, M., & Casabianca, F. (2019). Sharing values for changing practices, a lever for sustainable transformation? The case of farmers and processors in interaction within localized cheese sectors. Sustainability, 11(17), 4520.

Millet, M., Keast, V., Gonano, S., & Casabianca, F. (2020). Product qualification as a means of identifying sustainability pathways for place-based agri-food systems: the case of the GI Corsican grapefruit (France). Sustainability, 12(17), 7148.

Mishra, A., & Fatesaria, H. (2022). Basmati rice: the on-going domestic challenge. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27(2), 100-106.

Mitchell, J. R., Mitchell, R. K., Hunt, R. A., Townsend, D. M., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Stakeholder engagement, knowledge problems and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Ethics, 175, 75-94.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

Neilson, J., Wright, J., & Aklimawati, L. (2018). Geographical indications and value capture in the Indonesia coffee sector. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 35-48.

Niederle, P. A., Mascarenhas, G. C. C., & Wilkinson, J. (2017). Governança e institucionalização das indicações geográficas no Brasil. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 55(1), 85-102.

Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39-49.

O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2014). Managing CSR stakeholder engagement: a new conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 121-145.

Owen, L., Udall, D., Franklin, A., & Kneafsey, M. (2020). Place-based pathways to sustainability: Exploring alignment between geographical indications and the concept of agroecology territories in Wales. Sustainability, 12(12), 4890.

Pérez-Akaki, P., Vega-Vera, N. V., Enríquez-Caballero, Y. P., & Velázquez-Salazar, M. (2021). Designation of origin distillates in Mexico: value chains and territorial development. Sustainability, 13(10), 5496.

Pick, B., & Marie-Vivien, D. (2021). Representativeness in geographical indications: a comparison between the state-driven and producer-driven systems in Vietnam and France. Sustainability, 13(9), 5056.

Pisoni, A., Michelini, L., & Martignoni, G. (2018). Frugal approach to innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 107-126.

Priyadarshini, T., & Iyer, K. (2020). Sustenance of languishing craft-Gollabhama Saree of Siddipet, Telegana, India. Man-Made Textiles in India, 98(12), 403-410.

Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F., Penker, M., Belletti, G., Marescotti, A., Scaramuzzi, S., Barzini, E., Pircher, M., Leitgeb, F., & Samper-Gartner, L. F. (2016). Insights into the black box of collective efforts for the registration of Geographical Indications. Land Use Policy, 57, 103-116.

Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas – Sebrae. (2021). Cenários da indicações geográficas no Brasil. Brasília: Sebrae.

Sekine, K. (2021). The potential and contradictions of geographical indication and patrimonization for the sustainability of indigenous communities: a case of cordillera heirloom rice in the Philippines. Sustainability, 13(8), 4366.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.

Uchiyama, Y., Tanaka, Y., Matsuoka, H., & Kohsaka, R. (2017). Expectations of residents and tourists of agriculture-related certification systems: analysis of public perceptions. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 4(2), 110-117.

van der Merwe, M., Kirsten, J. F., & Trienekens, J. H. (2018). The Karoo Meat of Origin certification scheme: a silver bullet? The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 21(5), 655-668.

Vandecandelaere, E. (2010). Geographic origin and identification labels: associating food quality with location. In J. Albert (Ed.), Innovations in food labelling (pp. 137-152). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.

Vandecandelaere, E., Teyssier, C., Barjolle, D., Fournier, S., Beucherie, O., & Jeanneaux, P. (2020). Strengthening sustainable food systems through geographical indications: evidence from 9 worldwide case studies. Journal of Sustainability Research, 4(3), 1.

Warui, M. W., Mburu, J., Kironchi, G., & Gikungu, M. (2020). Existing value addition initiatives enhancing recognition of territorial traits of three Kenyan honey. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23(3-4), 598-605.

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112.
 


Submetido em:
28/08/2023

Aceito em:
12/03/2024

6686a57aa953953b4e6160e5 resr Articles
Links & Downloads

resr

Share this page
Page Sections